A little while ago, one of my pen pals suggested a fun photography challenge: each of us would be tasked with documenting a day in our lives (in Germany and New England, respectively) with the help of a disposable camera.
I hadn’t used one of those weird, boxy photo-machines since the early 2000s, so I was curious to return to the strange art of not-so-instant photography for the first time in years!
Surprisingly, it’s not all that easy to acquire a disposable camera these days. I ended up tracking down a little 27-exposure Kodak for under $15, but you can also get store-brand (e.g. CVS, Walgreens) cameras for way less. I developed them at CVS for another $15, and it took two weeks for me to get my prints–a lengthy process perhaps established to discourage hipster-wannabes for resurrecting the instant film market.
Though amateur/affordable photography has come such a long way since the golden age of disposables, there were some aspects of this seemingly ancient technology that I enjoyed rediscovering. I came of age during the rise of widely accessible digital camera technology, so I’m accustomed to photographic instant gratification. Call it unchecked nostalgia, but I actually grew fond of my inability to view the final product after I’d taken a snapshot: it made it easier to move on and enjoy the landscape without spending ages redoing the photo over and over again. These disposable images are unfocused and oversaturated memories of places and times: little universes unto themselves rather than true simulations of the real world…
…in other words, it may not be the best method for quality photography in the twenty-first century, but if you want to capture some ghostly, magical scenes for a faraway friend, what could be better?